One of the recurring themes in the book is the importance of a label. DeLillo often touches on the fact that everything we buy and everything we use is of a certain brand, and humans are drawn to specific brands that they tend to stay with for a long time. At the grocery store, there can be hundreds of the same product each with a different name. So this calls to question the idea of buying a label, or a name, instead of buying an actual product.
I find that this idea is very prevalent in the philanthropic world as well. Families or individuals often tie themselves to a certain foundation or charitable nonprofit and that organization is the one that gets all their money. It's all, in my opinion, a control issue. People, especially in this era, want to be able to control where their wealth goes and control how it is spent.

Foundations and charitable nonprofits often play upon this control issue. They sell their organizations to people the same way a brand of cereal would be sold -- through commercials and through ads in magazines or newspapers. As Babette says on page 252 about a sunscreen product, "It is all a corporate tie-in. The sunscreen, the marketing, the fear, the disease. You can't live one without the other."

These companies and these foundations sell you a label. And that's not so bad...until you start buying and donating solely based upon loyalty. But when does this happen? At what point do you start buying from a company or donating to an organization because of it's name and not because of the cause?